blast · cost land with the plan-metadata contract — never fabricated
PLAN · 1 ACTION
A1chat.posttext Analysis of incident inc-e67dc65d1667 confirms this is a false positive. The signal payload explicitly marks probe=true with severity=info and summary 'synthetic heartbeat'. The only signal received was aiops.signal.probe.v1, which is a probe signal type, not an error or alarm. Additionally, 'aiops-synthetic-probe' is AIOps' own self-test probe and is not a production service in the catalog. No supporting evidence of a real fault exists (no deployments, dependency failures, or error logs). This incident should be resolved as a false positive caused by detection logic incorrectly matching the probe signal to a service name.T1
EVIDENCE
hypothesis · No actual incident — synthetic heartbeat probe fired as informational signal and was mis-detected as an incident due to service name match.per-hypothesis evidence chips are not carried on the approval yet
no memory context on this approval — precedent lines render when the memory-hit join attaches them
